Project portfolio Browse selected work

Shopify Plus Upgrade Monthly Fee Reduction + Up to $4800 Development Fee Credit - Exclusive WesWoo Offer

SEO and GEO

Separate discovery, crawling, indexing and AI citations. Verify pages, variants and policy sources, then test real answers and purchase journeys.

For · Search content, product data and AI discovery owners

7 selected articles6 checklists8 questions

3 / 4

Content & evidence

Keep answers, conditions and sources together.

InputVerified facts and genuine materialOutcomeTraceable answers and ownership

How should knowledge content be structured for checking and citation?

Give a direct answer, then state its audience, conditions and exceptions. Connect important claims to original evidence and a real review date. Product content should identify the model, variant, market and buying conditions.

  • Distinguish brand statements, client material, industry examples and teaching assumptions.
  • Keep important explanations in readable page content reachable through ordinary links.

Clear structure supports understanding and verification, not a promised recommendation. Google’s AI search features require no special AI files or dedicated schema.

Sources checked 2026-11-12Open the checklist ↗

How should knowledge change when its sources change?

Trace affected claims to the original source and consuming pages. Recheck conditions, dates and languages before updating answers and articles, preserving the reason and previous record.

  • Check platform versions, policies and live configuration.
  • Compare the updated public copy and citation records.

Automatic retrieval can suggest candidates; factual judgment and publication require review.

Sources checked 2026-11-12
Articles & checklists for this step
AI content evidence and reviewUse one evidence record for facts, case attribution and changes across languages.
Make brand claims and project metrics verifiable
  1. Keep the entity and the date together

    Record the entity, event, date and source for each claim. Track platform launch, merchant adoption, partnership and incorporation as separate events. Check the About page, case studies, translations and Organization markup before publishing a founding date.

  2. Attribute each case to the people who did the work

    Separate work you delivered, reviews supplied by clients and cases published by a platform. Name the brand, market or store, responsible party, scope, launch date and source. If a platform case identifies its implementation partner, credit that party.

  3. Record the evidence behind each metric

    For historical samples, record period, inclusion criteria, sample size, numerator, denominator and baseline. For lab tests, record page, device, network, tool version and script configuration, and separate them from field data. For single-project results, give the observation window, baseline and relevant concurrent changes.

  4. Preserve original data and publish within its scope

    Keep client source material, figures, units and attribution. Describe a single project or test in its own context. Define the start, finish and day type for timelines and the denominator and exceptions for coverage claims. Resolve missing evidence in the internal record before broadening a claim.

  5. Compare language variants and rendered output

    Use the same fact record to check headings, summaries, graphic labels and both language versions. Check raw HTML and visible text before and after animation so intermediate counters do not appear as the final metric. Compare structured data with the visible page.

Brand evidence and content maintenance

Brand recognition rests on verifiable services, attributable cases and consistent information. Content and structured-data fixes improve communication; citations, rankings and enquiries need separate observation.

  1. Check brand facts

    Link scope, contact, regions and policies to actual pages. Preserve original client figures, dates and attribution; do not invent certification or outside endorsement.

  2. Separate experience from platform rules

    State conditions for project guidance. Link platform capabilities to official documentation and retain the access date. Preserve the nature of client evidence without presenting it as independent verification.

  3. Connect articles with service pages

    The guide organises questions and reading paths, articles explain methods, and service pages define scope and delivery. Give each article one primary home rather than copying its body into more pages.

  4. Review after a change

    Save previous versions, sources and reasons. Check both languages, links, visible content and structured data. Update affected rules when platforms change rather than bulk-refreshing dates.

Learn from project examples
INIU · Specifications to cart
Business problem
Power, capacity, ports and device compatibility need to be compared quickly.
Implementation described in the published case
The case places core specifications in the main reading area and connects scenario entry points, filtering and mobile add-to-cart to the same product fields.
Acceptance question for a new project
Choose different specifications, colours and stock states. Do the list, product page and cart refer to the same sellable configuration?
Read the full case ↗
Shokz UK · Scenarios and variants
Business problem
Shoppers first choose a sports or work range, then confirm colour, fit and accessories within a model.
Implementation described in the published case
The case separates scenario navigation from variants and keeps media, benefits and purchase controls tied to the current SKU.
Acceptance question for a new project
Switch colour and fit, then use the long-page purchase bar. Do imagery, price, benefit copy and cart variant remain consistent?
Read the full case ↗

Maintained by WESWOO · 2026-11-12

Related service · SEO, GEO and AI search services ↗

Working on a store project?

Connect what you have learned to the right scope, people and next steps.

Explore our services ↗